Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing it of overreach in attempting to control the university’s academic decisions by threatening federal funding.
The legal action follows the administration’s move to review nearly $9 billion in federal support after Harvard declined a list of demands, including the appointment of an outside overseer to ensure ‘diverse’ viewpoints in curriculum and policy decisions.
Harvard is specifically aiming to stop an immediate freeze on $2.2 billion in grants.
Harvard President Alan Garber stated that no government, regardless of political party, should have authority over what private universities teach, whom they admit or hire, or which fields of study they pursue.
Garber emphasized that such political interference compromises both academic freedom and the global reputation of US higher education.
After Harvard refused to comply, the administration escalated its actions, considering freezing an additional $1 billion in grants, initiating multiple investigations into the university’s operations, threatening the education of international students, and evaluating the revocation of Harvard’s 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status.
Garber wrote in a statement that, “These actions have stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world.”

This lawsuit is the first major legal response by a university to what many see as a politically charged campaign targeting elite academic institutions in the wake of pro-Palestinian student protests.
The Trump administration has accused universities of allowing antisemitism to spread on campuses and has labeled the protests as ‘anti-American.’
However, many protesters, including Jewish student groups, argue that their criticism of Israel’s military operations in Gaza has been unfairly equated with antisemitism.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration sent Harvard a formal letter outlining demands to restructure elements of its governance and operations, such as modifying admissions policies, defunding certain student clubs, and hiring new faculty members aligned with politically driven oversight.
White House spokesperson Harrison Fields defended the administration’s stance, calling federal aid a ‘privilege’ and stating that “Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege.”
Trump himself doubled down on the issue, posting on his Truth Social platform that Harvard should lose its tax-exempt status if it continues to “push political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness’.”
As the country’s oldest and wealthiest university, Harvard’s legal battle now sits at the center of a growing standoff over academic independence, student expression, and government authority.